First spoken on 2018/09/23 at Breslau Mennonite Church
Warning: This blog post discusses sexual misconduct/abuse of power by church and educational leaders.
In March 2022, Timothy Bruce Cavey, known as "Bruxy Cavey", whose theology and book Reunion is referenced in the following sermon turned blog post, was asked to resign as pastor of The Meeting House for sexual misconduct/abuse of his power as pastor for having sexual relations with multiple parishioners. Bruxy was arrested and charged with sexual assault but the charges were overturned by the court because the prosecutors claimed the evidence suggested there was no legal basis for these claims.
From 1997 to 2022 was lead teaching pastor at the megachurch The Meeting House and its predecessors, which was affiliated with the "Be In Christ", "Anabaptist" and "Jesus Collective" denominations. The church, which official suspended its operations in August 2024 because of a number of lawsuits leading to it losing its insurance coverage, was based in Oakville, Ontario, Canada and broadcast their services to movie theatres across Ontario and more broadly,
Here is a non-comprehensive list of articles about Bruxy Cavey's misconduct and the court case but I encourage you to do as much of your own personal research before making any conclusions or judgements about the situation and any of the people involved:
https://anabaptistworld.org/sexual-assault-charge-against-bruxy-cavey-stayed-ending-prosecution/
https://thewalrus.ca/meeting-house-lawsuits/
https://hamiltonpolice.on.ca/news/57-year-old-male-arrested-in-sexual-assault-investigation/
https://www.christianitytoday.com/2022/03/bruxy-cavey-meeting-house-resign-canada-anabaptist-abuse/
I, Jonathan M.W. Klassen, admit between 2017 and 2021, I was a big admirer and follower of Bruxy Cavey being an occasional attendee of The Meeting House at various of its locations across Ontario, and being part of various "House Church" small discussion groups affiliated with The Meeting House.
I also met Bruxy Cavey in person on two occasions: one after attending a service at the main site in Oakville where I took a photo with him, and the other when attending an event in 2019 also at the Oakville site where the church was promoting its "Jesus Collective" church partnership program which I attended with various members of Elevation Church in Waterloo, Ontario who I got a ride there with because someone told me they were also planning to attend.
I have not yet fully come to a conclusion about whether one can trust any teachings and theology of a person that abuses their power that comes from their teaching and ministry, but I tend to err on the side of that you should not put trust into anything anyone says who is deceptive or abusive.
So in reading my sermon turned blog-post below, I advise you to not put much weight into any of the teachings and content that came from Bruxy and his book Reunion but approach it with a critical mind as you should do with any piece of writing or speaking, including mine of course.
I do believe I had some wise things to say myself in this sermon turned blog-post, but the purpose of posting this as it is, is more about where my current thinking and beliefs came from and where they were back in 2018.
One last note before the sermon turned blog-post: Bruxy Cavey is attempting to do ministry again - unfortunately in my opinion - and is currently going by the pseudonym "The Ghost of 1820" which you can learn about on the following website: https://www.theghostof1820.com/. I can confirm this is run by Bruxy Cavey because I used the contact form and I got a response from someone who signed off as Bruxy and has a photo of himself with his Gmail account.
Good morning. So I want to start off by asking:
How many of you enjoy having tough conversations?
How many of you try to avoid having overly personal, or uncomfortable, or confrontational conversations as much as you can?
And how many of you do not appreciate being asked to participate during the sermon?
It’s ok, I wouldn’t either. I think this short video clip that we’re about to watch does a good job of illustrating how a lot of us often feel when we’re faced with having a tough conversation:
The point I wanted to make with this clip from Brooklyn Nine Nine, is that it isn’t uncommon or unnatural for us to try to get around tough conversations using techniques such as avoidance, or humour or even a Jamaican accent.
Most people don’t like conflict and most people don’t like to feel vulnerable which from my experience and observations I think holds true at our church.
It makes sense though because as a Mennonite church, a group of people who promote ourselves as pacifists we feel most comfortable in a state of peace and harmony.
Deep conversations which expose our true feelings, as well as our insecurities can disturb this state of peace and make us feel uncomfortable.
Although this makes a lot of sense, I don’t think it’s necessarily best for us that this mindset prevents us from having conversations where we have to truly speak our minds and share with each other how we really feel.
It’s ok though, I’m the same way, I’m part of this too.
I’ve often struggled myself in the past with being comfortable communicating with others what’s really on my mind whether it’s my opinion on a controversial issue, my analysis of a short story in English class, or just my mood and feelings in general at a certain point in time. We all have our own personality type and along with it different communication styles and types of conversation we feel comfortable with.
Whatever personality type each of one of us has though, and whatever communication method we prefer, I’m pretty sure deeper community and more authentic conversation is something we all yearn for deep down.
I know we usually have a brief amount of time each week to have discussions with each other during the Sunday School hour and some of us are brave enough to stand up and share what’s happening in our lives during sharing time but I don’t think this is enough. Despite the strong sense of community there seems to be here, I think we need to work at becoming more comfortable opening up and being vulnerable with each other, if we want to call ourselves a true church community.
So with this in my mind, I’m now going to make a case to you for why we as a church need more talk: more real talk, more talk about Jesus, and more of the small group program we call “Table Talk” to achieve these things:
More Real Talk
More Jesus Talk
More Table Talk
It has become pretty much second nature for me to start a conversation with someone with the phrase “Hey how’s it going?”. Most of the time this is followed by “pretty good, how are you?”, then I respond “pretty good” and we move on to talking about sports, or school, or work, or the weather, or whatever else we normally talk about. I enjoy this kind of conversation and I think having casual, good-humoured conversations like these is important because they help us make connections and keep friendships going.
I’ve been thinking about it more though and I’ve started to wonder: what does it actually mean when someone says they are “pretty good”?
I think subconsciously we interpret it to mean that this person must be having a fairly average day - there’s nothing going on in their life that they’re overly excited about, and there’s nothing going on in their life that they’re anxious about or is causing any internal struggle. Really though, I think most of the time “pretty good” is just code for “I don’t want to talk about what’s really on my mind or what’s really going on in my life with you right now.”
Now I'm not implying that during coffee hour or other fellowship time we have with each other, we need to open up and share all our inner personal thoughts, feelings, and opinions, or our deepest, darkest secrets and desires with each other. Like I said, I do see the importance in having light-hearted conversations even if they can be shallow.
It’s totally fair and valid to not want to talk about everything that’s on your mind all the time. Life would get very tiring and wouldn’t be much fun if every conversation we had turned into a counseling session or a heated intellectual discussion. I do think it’s important though that we make sure that there are good opportunities for each one of us to be able to have real conversation with another person or a group of people from the church community even if this means being vulnerable with each other and exposing our insecurities.
Because, as mentioned, this kind of conversation often makes us uncomfortable and it can be hard to break the ice and find a good time or the right person to talk to about what’s really on our minds, I think what we need is to try to intentionally create specific times and places for this kind of conversation to happen. This will allow those who may be lacking opportunities to have these kinds of conversation, and it will help strengthen the community in general.
You’ve probably heard of the campaign Bell puts on one day every year called “Let’s Talk” which is a fundraiser for mental health services and research and gives people an opportunity to share their own stories of mental health struggles to show how common but how hidden mental illness can be.
It’s a good initiative but I think this needs to be more than just a one day thing if we really want to end stigma around mental health issues. We need to be comfortable talking about our mental health with not only with our doctors, our counselors, our employers, our teachers, our parents, and other family members, but also our peers, our friends, and our fellow church members. This will be very hard to do though if we don’t make “real talk” with each other a normal, frequent habit of ours.
Being able to have more meaningful, in-depth, or personal conversations with one another on a regular basis will make it easier to support each other when we’re going through other sorts of challenges in life as well.
In his book Deepening Community: Finding Joy Together In Chaotic Times (available for purchase on Amazon) Paul Born co-founder and co-CEO of the Tamarack Institute which is based in the Kindred Credit Union Centre for Peace Advancement at Conrad Grebel University College, who some of you probably know, explains that when someone asks him what the most important thing people can do to make a difference in the world he responds by saying “bring chicken soup to your neighbour.”
At first, this seems like a very shallow, unsophisticated solution but when you think about it, it’s pretty clever.
The act of bringing your neighbour soup requires that you know your neighbour, that you know them well enough and communicate regularly enough to know they are sick. You also must feel the desire to help this neighbour who is sick, to make this a priority among the many areas of your life that require your time and energy. This neighbour must also know you well enough to feel comfortable receiving your help. Finally, Born points out that you must have enough of a relationship with the neighbour to know what they prefer when they are sick; they might not even like chicken soup!
None of these things could be true, bringing the chicken soup (or whatever else) would not be helpful or possible without prior talk, specifically real talk. So if we want to be a church that supports each other and helps each other through tough times, whether it be illness, mental health issues, or other struggles we go through, we need to keep this chicken soup illustration in mind and work together to find ways to foster the real talk that is required.
More Jesus talk. “Jesus talk” is one subset, it’s one part of this “real talk” that we often feel uncomfortable with.
If I’m not mistaken Jesus is the reason we’re all here right?
We call ourselves Christian, so the main purpose of going to church each Sunday is to worship God and learn how to live like Jesus Christ, the human version of God, the incarnate version of God, correct?
But are we all really trying to “make Jesus our centre”? The fire in our hearts? Our path, our guide? The reason that we live?
We do definitely learn lots about Jesus and his life throughout the year in scripture and messages here at church, but how much do we talk to each other about what he’s doing for us right here, right now, today, what impact he has on each us personally?
Many people, including myself admittedly, tend to only think about and talk about their faith in God and Jesus when at church on Sundays. Why don’t we do this more in our daily life? He’s the reason we are living life each day. He’s here with us all the time.
I totally understand why it can be uncomfortable to start conversations about how Jesus is acting in our own lives: it’s just not something we’re used to since it’s often off-limits to talk about our faith in a public or secular setting.
If you ever do feel like mentioning God or Jesus in conversation, you're worried people will think you're either a judgemental, arrogant religious person who believes they have higher moral standards than everyone else, or just a crazy, delusional person who seems to find spiritual justification for everything. At least these are the kinds of things that cause me hesitation.
I think the underlying reason we feel self-conscious and worried about talking about Jesus with others though, is that we have the wrong idea of who Jesus really is and what he really came for.
Bruxy Cavey, the teaching pastor at The Meeting House which I attended a few times while I was living in Mississauga for co-op last year, published a book called Reunion which really resonated with me and helped clear some things up for me about Jesus.
The book is structured around his summary and analysis of the good news of the gospel in one word, three words, and thirty words. Today, I’m going to give you a brief synopsis of the thirty-word explanation he wrote.
So, the good news in thirty words (I know it needs a bit of explaining but why don’t we read it together just to catch anyone who’s close to nodding off at this point): Jesus is God with us, come to show us God’s love, save us from sin, set up God’s kingdom, and shut down religion, so we can share in God’s life.
Let’s start with the opening phrase: Jesus is God with us.
It’s common knowledge but it hasn’t always sunk in for me and I haven’t always fully understood the ramifications behind the fact that Jesus and God are one in the same.
It was always part of God’s plan to come to us in human form not only to set an example for how we should live but also to experience what it’s like to be human, to live a physical, finite, human life, to go through the same pain, suffering and temptations that we go through in life.
This allows him to show us not only that he’s capable of empathizing with us and understanding what we go through, but that it is possible to get through the difficulties of life on Earth if you follow his lead and ask him for advice through means such as prayer.
Although we might not be able to understand all the reasons why, he decided it made most sense to come to us as a Jewish male in Israel, approximately 2000 years ago.
So why did he come?
Firstly, Jesus comes to us to show us God’s love.
Bruxy likes to explain that God cares so much about every single one of us and his relationship with each one of us that the kind of love he has can be described in human terms as wanting to be married to us. His love for each one of us is so strong, so unconditional though, it is deeper than any marriage or relationship that exists between humans.
No matter how hard we try, when we as human beings are in a relationship with another person, even a committed, intimate relationship with someone, we always end up putting ourselves first at some point, and it’s not possible for us to be able to give the other person the full support and attention they need at all times.
This is possible for God though and although it’s tough to comprehend, he is able to love every single person in the world in this way. Jesus came to teach us this, as well as to show us the best way we can love others in spite of our limitations as human beings.
Even though Jesus isn’t with us in physical human form at this time, he is still in this deep relationship with each of us. He is there walking beside you wherever you go, he is there sitting at the table with you as you eat and talk with others, and he is there to comfort you, to put his arm around you and listen to you when you’re having a bad day.
Why else did Jesus come?
He came to save us from sin. We don’t normally like to directly talk about sin here in the Mennonite church. It’s too negative, too controversial, too uncomfortable.
Often times when we think of sin, we think of things that we do that are wrong that we should feel guilty about, that we deserve to be punished for, and we think we have to make some sort of sacrifice to make things right with God again.
How could God possibly expect us to want be in a trusting, loving relationship with Him though if we are constantly scared of letting Him down and being punished?
As Bruxy explains in the book: “the word ‘sin’ translates into the Greek word "hamartia" which means “to miss the mark”, “to fail to hit the bull’s-eye”, “to be off-target”.
Sin refers to any way we fail to live the life of love for which we were created.” (Reunion, 99).
We all sin so much that sin seems natural: we all are constantly doing things in our daily lives that aren’t loving, that aren’t the way we were created to live.
Sometimes it’s hard to know what sin is and what it isn’t: our physiology often causes us to sin and our past traumas or past exposure to sin can engrain sinfulness into our psychology which influences how we think and behave.
However normal it may seem though, sin is nothing but bad news. Living in ways we weren’t intended to has natural negative consequences, because sin separates us from the creator of nature, the source of life: God.
If you think of sin as all the ways we do damage to ourselves and to God’s creation, and you put this into monetary terms, we would all have a lot debt to repay because we are constantly sinning and unfortunately we don’t do enough good deeds, to pay this debt off ourselves.
God has so much love for us, so much grace that he allowed himself, through Jesus, to be brought to death on the cross, and in doing so not only removed the barrier that prevents us from being in relationship with Him but also forgave our debt of sins, He wiped the slate clean.
Now I know this concept can be hard to actually wrap your head around, even though you’ve probably heard it many times before. It all sounds great but what does this actually mean and how does this impact how I should live my life?
Try thinking about it this way: although, theoretically Jesus could’ve lived on Earth forever (he’s God after all) Jesus had to die, resurrect, and then return to be one with God, to show us that his Spirit (the Spirit of God, the Holy Spirit, the third aspect of the trinity), lives inside all of us and is what allows us to make choices that bring us closer to God.
This was God’s plan. If things had not occured this way, we would feel the need to be constantly searching for Jesus to figure out the right way to live. It would not sink in that Jesus’ or God’s spirit is right here inside of us if things hadn’t happened this way.
So just as the essence of sin itself is separation from God, the consequences or the incurred cost of sinning is being separated from God. Because of Jesus’ death, resurrection, and return to the Father though we don’t have to suffer these consequences, because we know God is within us as the Spirit. We are able to live a life of love in a world indebted by sin.
This does not mean we will not ever suffer these consequences though: we can still be tempted to not trust the Spirit, to submit to all the other influences and temptations of sin that exist in the world, including within ourselves. We can still allow things to get between us and God.
To be inseparable from God, to live the way we were created to live, to do our part in putting an end to the pain and suffering that exists in the world, to love, and to be loved, all we have to do is choose to be in relationship with God, by trying to live how Jesus lived and allowing the Spirit inside each one of us to guide us in doing so.
So next:
God also came through Jesus to set up his kingdom on Earth. This isn’t a kingdom with physical, boundaries, a kingdom with laws and citizenship requirements though.
We may live in the country of Canada and we should do what we can to obey its rules and customs, but first and foremost we are members of God’s kingdom so we should be putting the peaceful, loving ways of God’s kingdom ahead of anything else, even if it contradicts the ways of the institutionalized geographical kingdom we happen to live in, or the social norms that exist in our culture.
Hardcore patriots may not like it, but I think it’s makes more sense to simply call myself a human being, or a child of God before I call myself a Canadian. God’s kingdom exists in our individual relationships, not within a particular culture or geographic area.
“The most sacred geography on the planet,” as Bruxy puts it, “is not a building or a sacred site or a religious pilgrimage. The most sacred space on the planet is the space between you and me when we love each other as Jesus does.”
So we don’t have to wait for after death to experience heaven, Jesus modeled for us how we can bring the kingdom of heaven to Earth by working towards loving each person we meet right now.
So that sums up my synopsis of the good news in thirty words which I hope can help us engage in more Jesus talk.
When I say “ more Jesus talk” though I don’t only mean we need to talk more about Jesus, we also need to be more like Jesus in how we talk to each other.
We need to be able to call each other out on our sins, help each other deal with the sinful ways of living that feels natural to us, and lead each other to the way of Jesus: all without being judgemental, because judgmentalism is a sin as well.
He needs to be our guide, the centre of our moral theories and how we talk to each other because I believe he really is “the way, the truth, and the life”.
I know I’ve probably broken some unwritten rules about sermon length already so I won’t go into detail about it but printed on the handout are "Five Steps for Loving More and Judging Less" which were also put together by Bruxy and is based on Matthew 7:1-6.
I think these could be very helpful and powerful if we all took them to heart and put them into practice.
So finally, more "Table Talk". How can we encourage more real talk and more Jesus talk? I think Table Talk is one way we can.
Joining a home church in Mississauga last year was what got me involved with The Meeting House church and it was a very good experience for me since it not only put me out of my comfort zone, but showed me the value of having deeper conversations in a small group setting. This is where I got the inspiration for helping to start Table Talk here at Breslau.
Around fifty of us participated in the Table Talk program we tried our earlier this year here in which for three weeks, groups of about ten people met after church at one of their member’s house for lunch and conversation around the sermon that had been preached that Sunday (here are some pictures of the groups).
From the feedback survey that was sent out afterwards, overall the response was positive: people found Table Talk to be a good way to get to know people from the church who they may not have necessarily known well beforehand and it provided a chance for us to have insightful conversation and hear different perspectives.
The main issues that were brought up were the time and frequency the Table Talk meetings were held, as well the nature of the questions being asked and people not always feeling comfortable opening up and sharing their thoughts to these questions in that kind of setting, especially in the first week.
We had originally planned to try Table Talk again this fall with some changes that take this feedback into account but with it being a busy time for many people at the church, we’ve decided that it makes sense to delay it until late-winter or early-spring of next year.
There is some information on the handout about what our plans are for this next installment of Table Talk just to give you a general idea of when and how it will work this time but more details will be given closer to then.
Even with these changes and after hearing all that I talked about today though, I’m sure some of you still might not be interested in or comfortable joining Table Talk and that’s perfectly fine.
Table Talk isn't the only way and not even necessarily the best way to foster deeper conversations and grow closer to one another.
There are many other ways you could try to achieve this: book studies, Bible studies, hosting others for meals on your own, regular coffee meetings with one other person, using rehearsal breaks for those of you involved in the Joseph play to have more intimate conversations with each other, whatever works, you have to find what's right for you.
If you are able to though, I encourage you to give Table Talk a try and we can see what comes out of it.
So again, nothing of what I said today will change your personality or take away any insecurities or hesitations you might have about having deeper conversations or conversations about Jesus completely. I'm still the same way, my default is to avoid this kind of thing as much as I can.
My instinct would be to bolt out of this building as soon as I'm done sharing something like this so I don't have to discuss this further with anyone.
Just because it's my instinct though, just because my introverted personality causes me to feel this way doesn’t mean it's what I really want, doesn’t mean it’s what’s best for me, doesn’t mean it’s what God thinks is best for me.
If we're supportive of each other and we try to work at this together through initiatives like Table Talk, I think we will be able to strengthen our relationships with each other and with God, and experience heaven right here in Breslau, even more than we currently do now.
So if any of this has resonated with you, if you’d like to join me in trying to achieve this: let's talk.